Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2020

Doing Business In Canada - 2020 Edition

Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Explore more from Fogler, Rubinoff LLP

Canada is geographically the world's second largest country, with an area of approximately 10 million square kilometres and a population exceeding 37 million.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

Canada is geographically the world's second largest country, with an area of approximately 10 million square kilometres and a population exceeding 37 million. The United States is smaller in area, but the Canadian population is only slightly more than 1/10 of the population of the United States.

Roughly 70% of the Canadian population resides within 100 kilometres of its southern boundary with the United States - in the highly industrialized corridor between Windsor, Ontario and Québec City, Québec. As a result, Canada and the United States share many economic imperatives and cultural influences. The economic and material aspirations and realizations of the Canadian and the United States populations are strikingly similar.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Shareholders' Agreements: The Decisions Behind The Document

Putting a unanimous shareholders' agreement in place is an exercise in good governance. It gives a group of owners an agreed framework for running the corporation, sharing its profits and dealing with the departure of a shareholder, and it settles those questions at a point when everyone is still working well together. Every agreement is different, because the answers depend on who the shareholders are and what each of them wants from the business.
CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law
Fillmore Riley
Fillmore Riley
Article

October 2026 Amendments To Chambers Practice In British Columbia: What To Know

The amendments were developed with the input of stakeholders, including members of the judiciary, the legal profession, government ministries and the public, in response to ongoing concerns regarding chambers delays, scheduling inefficiencies, inaccurate time estimates, and matters that are set down for hearing but ultimately do not proceed as scheduled
CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law
Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP
Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP
Article

Update: Bare Trust Reporting Rules For 2026

The federal government has finalized revised reporting rules for bare trusts, significantly narrowing the original requirements. While bare trusts are generally exempt from filing for 2023-2025, certain arrangements involving separated legal and beneficial ownership will face new filing obligations starting with the 2026 taxation year, with specific exemptions for family trusts, joint ownership arrangements, and principal residences.
CanadaTax
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Article

Ontario Court Of Appeal: Using The Words “at Any Time” Or “for Any Reason” In A Without Cause Termination Provision Does Not Breach The Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”)

The Ontario Court of Appeal has issued a landmark ruling on employment termination provisions, addressing whether contractual language permitting termination "at any time" or "for any reason" violates the Employment Standards Act. This decision overturns a controversial lower court ruling and provides crucial clarity for employers drafting termination clauses. The court emphasized a practical, contextual approach to interpreting employment contracts rather than isolating specific phrases.
CanadaEmployment and HR
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Article

Court Of Appeal Clarifies Law On Mitigating Damages In Wrongful Dismissal Claims

The Ontario Court of Appeal has established new clarity on employer obligations in wrongful dismissal cases, addressing both the burden of proof for mitigation efforts and the treatment of income earned during notice periods. This ruling in Williamson v Brandt Tractor Inc. resolves critical questions about when employers must demonstrate available comparable employment and how courts should handle mitigation income from lower-paying positions.
CanadaEmployment and HR
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP