Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2012

Director Elections And Shareholder Democracy

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

With proxy season approaching, issues surrounding the election of directors of public companies will once again come to the fore.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

With proxy season approaching, issues surrounding the election of directors of public companies will once again come to the fore. This article reviews some of the issues regarding director elections that exist and that gained the attention of Canadian securities regulators last year.

slate vs. individual director elections

Under a slate system, a group of directors (a slate) is nominated for election, usually by management of the company. Shareholders vote for the slate on an "all or none" basis, resulting in the entire slate either being elected or not being elected.

A criticism of slate elections is the inability of shareholders to express approval or disapproval for individual directors. While slate elections were at one time quite widespread, their prevalence has declined significantly over the past number of years in favour of individual director elections. Individual director elections allow shareholders to cast votes on director nominees on an individual

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from