Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 SEPTEMBER 2022

Court Decision Highlights "Nominee" Director Issues

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Centerra Judge found the breaches of fiduciary duties the most egregious he had ever seen.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Key Highlights

  • Centerra Judge found the breaches of fiduciary duties the most egregious he had ever seen.
  • Nominee director principles in Centerra are relevant to directors of corporations governed by the Canada Business Corporations Act.
  • Shareholders may need to establish rules of engagement for "nominee" directors.

The recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Centerra Gold Inc. v. Bolturuk1 [Centerra] reported on August 26, 2022, highlights important duties of "nominee" directors-directors who have been appointed by a specific shareholder or class of shareholders.

The judge found the breaches of fiduciary duties to be the most egregious breaches he had ever seen. The facts are unusual and involve the Kyrgyz Republic's takeover of a gold mine in that country owned by a Canadian public company. The Kyrgyz Republic held a substantial minority ownership stake in the Canadian company and, pursuant to a shareholders agreement, was entitled

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from