Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 OCTOBER 2014

Reminder To Retailers: You Are The Low-Hanging Fruit For Potential Plaintiffs

The British Columbia Supreme Court found the defendant pharmacy liable to the plaintiff who had suffered a severe burn from a medicated patch she bought to treat muscle pain.

CanadaConsumer Protection

In Nogueira v. O. Alasaly Pharmacy Ltd.,1 the British Columbia Supreme Court found the defendant pharmacy liable to the plaintiff who had suffered a severe burn from a medicated patch she bought to treat muscle pain. This case serves as a reminder to retailers that they can still be found liable, even where the specific cause of the defect is not proven, and even though the plaintiff may not have a strong case against the distributor and/or the manufacturer. It also illustrates that a retailer can be found liable even where there are no other recorded complaints for a product that has been purchased several million times.

The plaintiff had muscle soreness in her left thigh and purchased a box of analgesic patches at the defendant pharmacy, which had been distributed by Sanofi Consumer Health Inc. ("Sanofi"). The patches were intended to provide a cooling and heating therapy for muscle pain. The Court noted that the plaintiff read the instructions on the box and that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from