Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2017

Lenders Beware: The Ferro Decision And Consequences Of Non-Disclosure

The Ontario Consumer Protection Act, SO 2002, c 30, Sched A (the "CPA") contains provisions requiring lenders to provide extensive financial disclosure to consumers.

CanadaConsumer Protection

The Ontario Consumer Protection Act, SO 2002, c 30, Sched A (the "CPA") contains provisions requiring lenders to provide extensive financial disclosure to consumers. Although the consequences of a lender's non-compliance can be severe, including punitive or exemplary damages payable to the consumer, case law on the disclosure provisions of the CPA is relatively sparse. Accordingly, the Ontario Superior Court's recent decision in Lexfund v Ferro et al, 2016 ONSC 4113 ("Ferro") is particularly valuable for illustrating the lender disclosure requirements and the court's interpretation thereof.

The Plaintiff in Ferro, Lexfund Inc., is a corporation that loaned money to various personal injury claimants to assist them in financing their litigation, medical and living expenses, and other disbursements pending a resolution of their motor vehicle accident claims. The claimant borrowers had all retained the law firm of Ferro & Company to represent them and it was Mr.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from