Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2021

Directors Fined Personally In FlightHub DRIP Pricing Settlement

Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
Explore more from Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP

In our Competition Law Year In Review 2019, we reported on Canada's Competition Bureau's interim consent agreement with FlightHub...

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law
Michael Binetti
Michael Binetti
Author LinkedIn connections

In our Competition Law Year In Review 2019, we reported on Canada's Competition Bureau's interim consent agreement with FlightHub prohibiting it from using misleading marketing practices on its websites.

On February 24, 2021, FlightHub and the Bureau settled the Bureau's allegations that the operator of FlightHub.com and JustFly.com misled consumers about prices and services, made millions in revenue from hidden fees, and posted false online reviews.

The Bureau has been prosecuting claims of alleged drip pricing for a number of years (see some of our posts here). Drip pricing includes the practice of advertising low prices to attract consumers while burying mandatory fees in the terms and conditions. This practice can be misleading to consumers and contrary to the Competition Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Competition Bureau Reaches Consent Agreement With Empire Company Limited Regarding Grocery Property Controls

The Competition Bureau of Canada has entered into a consent agreement with Empire Company Limited, parent of major grocery chains including Sobeys and Safeway, restricting the company's use of property controls that limit competition. This agreement prohibits Empire from enforcing certain restrictive covenants and exclusivity clauses that prevent other grocers from operating nearby, despite Empire's earlier voluntary commitments. The Bureau's action signals heightened regulatory scrutiny of property control
CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Article

Greenwashing In Canada: What The Competition Bureau’s 2026 Updated Environmental Claims Guidelines Mean For Your Business

Canada's Competition Bureau has released updated guidelines addressing environmental claims and greenwashing under the Competition Act. The guidelines establish six compliance principles and clarify how businesses must substantiate environmental benefit claims following recent legislative amendments, including changes introduced by Bill C-15 that provide greater flexibility in substantiation methods while maintaining evidence requirements.
CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law
WeirFoulds LLP
WeirFoulds LLP
Article

Cassels On Competition: October 2026

More particularly, the Plaintiff had argued that the drip pricing provision in subsection 52(1.3) of the Competition Act requires “all-inclusive pricing” and forbids all forms of “fragmented or segmented pricing,” and that Ticketmaster’s partitioned price representations are thus prohibited as a criminal conduct and amount to false or misleading representations covered by the criminal misleading advertising provision in section 52
CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law
Cassels
Cassels