Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2026

Respecting Annulments, Pursuing Assets: Two BVI Decisions On Arbitral Award Enforcement

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

They demonstrate the BVI is a jurisdiction that is both respectful of the limits of its enforcement powers and robust in its willingness to give effect to valid New York Convention Awards.

British Virgin IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Two significant recent judgments delivered by the BVI court, Abdul Kadir Al Muhaidib & Sons Company v Dr Moamena Kamel & Others BVIHC(COM)2024/0213 (29 January 2026) and NKT v NMH and ATG BVIHCMAP2024/0031 (30 January 2026), illustrate the breadth of the court's engagement with arbitration award enforcement and the procedural mechanisms available to creditors for asset tracing. They demonstrate the BVI is a jurisdiction that is both respectful of the limits of its enforcement powers and robust in its willingness to give effect to valid New York Convention Awards.

NKT v NMH and ATG BVIHCMAP2024/0031 (30 January 2026)

NKT v NMH and ATG is a significant Court of Appeal authority for BVI arbitration enforcement practice and is a "green light" to enforcement of arbitral awards against persons who, although being third parties to underlying arbitration and not named in the arbitral award, are alleged to hold assets on behalf of the award debtor.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from