Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2022

Reflective Loss And Strike Out / Summary Judgment: Burnford & Ors v Automobile Association Developments Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1943

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

The English Court of Appeal has confirmed that cases concerning reflective loss are suitable for strike out / summary judgment.

British Virgin IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The English Court of Appeal has confirmed that cases concerning reflective loss are suitable for strike out / summary judgment. The reflective loss principle has its origins in a principle of company law known as the rule in Foss v Harbottle, or the “proper plaintiff” rule, i.e. the only person who can seek relief for an injury done to a company is the company itself.

The rule against reflective loss is a rule of substantive law (rather than procedural law) which provides that a shareholder cannot claim for losses it has suffered in its capacity as a shareholder (for example a diminution in share value or in distributions). Those are the losses of the company which the law does not regard as separate and distinct from the shareholder's loss. Were it not for the application of the reflective loss principle, the rule in Foss v Harbottle would be subverted.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from