Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MAY 2017

Garkusha Under The Spotlight

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

In the second of two articles evaluating the BVI courts' recent approach to the recovery of foreign lawyers' fees under adverse costs orders in commercial litigation, Tameka Davis, counsel at Conyers, Dill & Pearman in the British Virgin Islands, ...

British Virgin IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the second of two articles evaluating the BVI courts' recent approach to the recovery of foreign lawyers' fees under adverse costs orders in commercial litigation, Tameka Davis, counsel at Conyers, Dill & Pearman in the British Virgin Islands, finds a February decision of the Court of Appeal has provided some welcome predictability on the matter.

In CDR's November-December 2016 issue, the author explored the then recent decision by the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, sitting in the British Virgin Islands, in Dimitry Vladimirovich Garkusha v Ashot Yegiazaryan (Garkusha) on the question of the recoverability of foreign lawyers' fees as a disbursement or otherwise in the context of the limitations presented by the new Legal Profession Act 2015 (Act).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from