Until recently Russian and CIS clients would often, without
hesitation, choose London as the seat of arbitration and the London
Court of International Arbitration Rules as the rules governing the
arbitral procedure. Today, parties now opt for more non-traditional
alternatives, and in so doing recognise that there is no strict
correlation between the choice of the seat and the arbitration
rules adopted by the parties.
The arbitration rules set out the parties' agreement about
the procedural framework of the arbitration. In the absence of the
parties' agreement, the arbitration act of the relevant seat
provides the statutory framework for the arbitral procedure. The
"seat" in actuality is a legal fiction of sorts. It is
not the geographical location of the arbitration proceedings that
is its venue; it is the law governing the arbitration procedure.
This can be significant, as it will also determine the degree of
involvement or intervention which the courts