Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2019

Choosing The BVI As The Seat Of Arbitration

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

Until recently Russian and CIS clients would often, without hesitation, choose London as the seat of arbitration and the London Court of International Arbitration Rules as the rules governing the arbitral procedure.

British Virgin IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Until recently Russian and CIS clients would often, without hesitation, choose London as the seat of arbitration and the London Court of International Arbitration Rules as the rules governing the arbitral procedure. Today, parties now opt for more non-traditional alternatives, and in so doing recognise that there is no strict correlation between the choice of the seat and the arbitration rules adopted by the parties.

The arbitration rules set out the parties' agreement about the procedural framework of the arbitration. In the absence of the parties' agreement, the arbitration act of the relevant seat provides the statutory framework for the arbitral procedure. The "seat" in actuality is a legal fiction of sorts. It is not the geographical location of the arbitration proceedings that is its venue; it is the law governing the arbitration procedure. This can be significant, as it will also determine the degree of involvement or intervention which the courts

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from