Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 NOVEMBER 2026

Bermuda Case Insights: Supreme Court Rulings Examine Due Process Rights And Judicial Independence

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

The Supreme Court of Bermuda has issued two landmark constitutional judgments examining the protections available to a sitting judge facing appellate criticism and the constitutional limits on judicial service terms. These unprecedented cases, brought by a Supreme Court judge challenging both the Court of Appeal's criticism and the Chief Justice's administration of her sick leave, affirm that courts themselves are subject to constitutional scrutiny while underscoring the Chief Justice's critical role

BermudaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In two landmark judgments the Supreme Court of Bermuda has considered, for the first time, the constitutional protections available to a sitting judge facing serious criticism from an appellate court and the constitutional limits on the terms of a judge’s service. The proceedings were brought by a judge of the Supreme Court. She challenged the Court of Appeal’s criticism of her conduct, the referral of that criticism for disciplinary investigation, and the Chief Justice’s administration of her sick leave. Together the judgments affirm that the courts themselves are as amenable to constitutional scrutiny as any other public body and underscore the Chief Justice’s role in safeguarding judicial independence.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from