Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 FEBRUARY 2011

Interim Measures To Ensure The Enforceability Of Foreign Arbitral Awards

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Contributor
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr is a leading European full-service law firm with a strong footprint across Central and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Frequently, a claimant may be well advised to ensure the eventual enforceability of an award he hopes will be rendered in his favour already in the course of, or even before, initiating arbitral proceedings.

AustriaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Alfred Siwy
Alfred Siwy
Lisa Beisteiner
Lisa Beisteiner
Author LinkedIn connections

Frequently, a claimant may be well advised to ensure the eventual enforceability of an award he hopes will be rendered in his favour already in the course of, or even before, initiating arbitral proceedings.

For this purpose, a claimant will primarily consider obtaining an interim measure freezing the respondent's assets. Especially when raising claims against multinational corporations the claimant will detect such assets in various jurisdictions – some apparently more attractive in this respect than others.

Under Austrian law, a claimant in a pending or upcoming arbitration can request interim measures from state courts or, alternatively, from the arbitral tribunal.1

Whenever Austrian state courts are called upon to grant interim measures to secure the enforceability of an upcoming arbitral award, their jurisdiction will be based on section 387(2) Austrian Enforcement Act (EA). Accordingly, the court in whose jurisdictions the respondent is domiciled or has its

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from