Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 FEBRUARY 2010

Who Decides Who Decides? ECJ Rules On The "Kompetenz-Kompetenz" Of Arbitral Tribunals

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Contributor
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr is a leading European full-service law firm with a strong footprint across Central and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

The so-called "Kompetenz-Kompetenz" principle in essence provides that an arbitral tribunal decides itself whether it has jurisdiction to decide a dispute brought before it.

AustriaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Katarina Hruskovicova
Katarina Hruskovicova
Alfred Siwy
Alfred Siwy
Author LinkedIn connections

This article was originally published in the schoenherr roadmap`10 - if you would like to receive a complimentary copy of this publication, please visit: http://www.schoenherr.eu/roadmap.

The so-called "Kompetenz-Kompetenz" principle in essence provides that an arbitral tribunal decides itself whether it has jurisdiction to decide a dispute brought before it1. That means that, in principle, a state court has no role to play in a decision of an arbitral tribunal on its own competence.

Introduction

This principle, however, has never been implemented in its purest form. How far its implementation reaches within the realm of Regulation 44/20012 (the Regulation) has now been clarified by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in its decision in the matter of Allianz SpA and another v. West Tankers Inc3.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from