Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 AUGUST 2014

Snapshots: Tax on employment cases

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Two decisions highlight the need to consider the intricacies of tax law for payments made to employees or ex-employees.

AustraliaTax

Two decisions highlight the need to consider the intricacies of tax law when it comes to payments made to employees or former employees. The first decision concerns capital payments for general damages and the second decision concerns the application of compulsory superannuation to contractors.

Case 1: General damages

In Public Servant v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2014] ITAA 247 the Administrative Appeals Tribunal was required to review an objection to a private ruling on whether a payment made to a former Public Servant, under the terms of a Deed of Release which expressly provided that it represented general damages, was income or capital. This was important because if it was income it would be subject to tax being withheld as an employment termination payment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from