Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2018

Valid exercise of option or abandonment?

Protracted negotiations as to varied terms for future lease did not mean the tenant had abandoned the option lease.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

What happens if a tenant exercises their option then subsequently the parties negotiate different terms and conditions? This recent Supreme Court case decided whether the lease arising out of that option had been abandoned by the tenant by negotiating the terms of a new lease (substantially different to the option lease) over a long period of time. In this case, the Court found the protracted negotiations did not mean the tenant had abandoned the option lease.

Valid exercise of option or abandonment

Mr Gupta (Tenant) brought proceedings against Fordham Laboratories Pty Ltd (Landlord) (Gupta v Fordham Laboratories Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 551) seeking, amongst other things, injunctive relief to restrain the Landlord from treating particular letters as valid notices to terminate his tenancy (due to breaches which are not dealt with in this article) and from taking any steps to re-enter the premises or to forfeit the Tenant's leasehold interest in the premises. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from