Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 NOVEMBER 2017

Residential Focus - 8 November 2017: Part 1 - Contract void for illegality?

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

The Court held that the contract for the sale of land was able to be performed lawfully, so it was not unenforceable.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

On 23 October 2017 the New South Wales Court of Appeal handed down its decision in REW08 Projects Pty Ltd v PNC Lifestyle Investments Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 269. The case concerned a contract for the sale of land which the appellant argued was void for illegality.

Facts

The appellant entered into a contract to sell a lot in a subdivision at Schofields in western Sydney to the respondent. The contract stipulated the purchase price was $485,000, with a deposit of $250,000 to be paid. Two special conditions in the contract provided:

  1. that the appellant vendor had a right to rescind the contract and simultaneously enter into a new contract on identical terms; and
  2. for a price reduction of $235,000 (being the balance of the purchase price) to be made at settlement provided that the purchaser respondent met all obligations under the contract by that time.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from