Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 AUGUST 2017

Essential terms must be agreed in a retail lease

We discuss Pozetu Pty Ltd v Alexander James Pty Ltd [2016] NSW 205.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

A recent NSW Court of Appeal case confirmed a failure of the Market Review clause resulted in an Option Lease not coming into existence – and hence, the tenant did not repudiate it. The case is interesting in how the Retail Leases Act moderates market review clauses, and also is a good reminder about the need for clear agreement between the parties on all the essential terms – an agreement to agree is not enforceable.

In the case, Pozetu Pty Ltd v Alexander James Pty Ltd [2016] NSW 205, the lease of a retail premises in Queen Street Woollahra contained an option to renew with a market review. The lessee (Alexander James Pty Ltd) exercised that option and the initial lease expired. The parties didn't come to an agreement about the rent, and the lessee continued paying the same rent it was paying in the final year of the initial term. About 6 months into the option term, the lessee gave notice to the lessor that it would leave the premises and terminate the lease.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from