Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2014

Can private development rules trump public planning policies?

A restrictive covenant "restricts" the use of land, so that the value and enjoyment of adjoining land can be preserved.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

By Daniel Moulis, Principal and Lauren Gray, Lawyer

Developers often want to "lock-in" the value of the amenity and design of a new development, such as in a commercial precinct or new suburb. Similarly, residents of a street or suburb often wish they had some way of controlling what their neighbours do on surrounding blocks of land.

What if there was a way to define your own rules, for your own development, or your own street? Could your rules override what the local planning body wanted to do in the future? Maybe you can, by way of covenants to controland restrict what adjoining landowners can do with their land.

The issue is back in the news, with recent media reports suggesting that the chief executive of the Sussan Group cannot redevelop her $12 million residential property in Melbourne the way she wants to, because of a covenant imposed in 1890 limiting the roof of any structure built on the land to"slates or tiles".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from