Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 APRIL 2023

Breach notices – Recent case setting out some of the rules

VCAT decided that the breach notice was valid and the landlord was entitled to terminate the lease by re-entry.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

Breach notices – Recent case setting out some of the rules

Dunn & others v Shivsai Pty Ltd [2022] VCAT 9711

This case in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) was brought by the landlord of a supermarket premises in Murrumbeena, Victoria. The landlord had terminated the lease after serving a breach notice under section 146 of the Property Law Act (Vic) 1958. The landlord sought damages of approximately $100,000 from the tenant for breach of the lease.

The tenant's defence was that the landlord had terminated the lease wrongfully, breached the covenant for quiet enjoyment, acted unconscionably and caused the tenant losses of approximately $500,000. The tenant also claimed that in the event the termination was valid, the landlord had failed to mitigate its losses, and as such the damages payable to the landlord should be reduced.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from