Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 DECEMBER 2013

AAPT hacking case study: what would happen if it was an agency under the new law?

The case provides a useful scenario to examine what would the result be if the same issues arose under the new law.

AustraliaPrivacy

Recently, AAPT customer data was hacked and published on the internet. Following an own motion investigation, on 15 October, Australian Privacy Commissioner, Timothy Pilgrim, found AAPT had breached the Privacy Act in respect of the incident.

The case provides a useful scenario to examine what would the result be if the same issues arose for an agency under the new law. In particular, the case provides useful guidance around the Commissioner's thinking on:

  • what constitutes "disclosure" and what constitutes "use"
  • what your obligations are when you use a third party server, and
  • what your training obligations are.

Background

This case involved AAPT's company data (including customers' personal information) being accessed and stolen by Anonymous, an international network of "hacktivists", between 17 and 19 July 2012. Anonymous subsequently published the data on the internet.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from