Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2017

ACCCs mobile roaming inquiry: Where to now?

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

The ACCC decided that it was not convinced that consumers would be better off if mobile roaming services are declared.

AustraliaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

On 5 May 2017 the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) issued a draft decision that it will not declare any mobile roaming services (that is, services allowing the customers of one mobile network to use the services of another in areas where the first network does not have coverage). A declaration would have had the practical effect of requiring Telstra, as the network operator with the largest geographical reach, to provide roaming services to its competing network operators, currently Optus and Vodafone, in those areas where those competitors do not have coverage.

The ACCC decided that, notwithstanding Telstra may charge a premium to its customers for the extended coverage it provides, it was not convinced that consumers would be better off if roaming was declared. In particular, if a declaration was made, prices could potentially increase for all consumers (or consumers in regional and remote areas) and the investment decisions of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from