Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 01 JULY 2026

Workplace Defamation: Groupchats And Private Messages (Video)

Workplace messages sent through private chat platforms like WhatsApp, Teams, or Slack can give rise to defamation claims in Queensland if they communicate harmful statements about someone's reputation to even a small group of colleagues. Understanding when internal workplace communications cross the line into defamation, what defences are available, and the potential legal consequences for both individuals and employers is crucial for anyone using digital communication in professional settings.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Article Summary

Workplace messages sent through WhatsApp, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Signal, text messages, or other private chat platforms can give rise to defamation claims in Queensland, even if they are only seen by a small group of colleagues.

The law focuses on whether a defamatory statement was communicated to at least one other person and whether it causes, or is likely to cause, serious harm to the subject’s reputation, not on whether it was published publicly.

In this article, our defamation lawyers explain when workplace messages become defamatory, how courts assess publication, meaning, identification, and the serious harm requirement, and why allegations of dishonesty, fraud, harassment, or misconduct in internal chats can expose individuals and, in some cases, employers to legal liability.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from