Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 FEBRUARY 2025

Malice in defamation claims: A comprehensive guide

If malice is established, it removes legal protections, increases the severity of damages & holds defendants fully accountable for reputational harm.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Article Summary

Malice is a crucial element in Australian defamation law, as it can defeat key legal defences such as qualified privilege and honest opinion.

Unlike general hostility or recklessness, malice requires proof that the dominant purpose behind a defamatory statement was improper, dishonest, or intended to cause harm.

If malice is established, it removes legal protections, increases the severity of damages, and holds defendants fully accountable for reputational harm.

In this article, our defamation lawyers provide a comprehensive analysis of malice in defamation claims, covering:

  1. The definition of malice and its role in defamation law
  2. How courts distinguish malice from ill-will, bias, and recklessness

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from