Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MARCH 2020

How the term "coward punch" won a $100,000 defamation payout

Interesting case where a tourist won a defamation case against a broadcaster who reported that the tourist threw a coward punch.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

For many years the families of "king-hit" victims have argued that this term conveys a false measure of admiration and implies manliness on the part of the attacker. Demands for a new phrase to describe such despicable one-punch surprise attacks have led to "king-hit" being replaced by the phrase "coward punch", reflecting the cowardly act that it is.

Use of term "coward punch" intended to deter assailants

Language is a powerful tool – in society and in law. Replacing the term "king-hit" with "coward punch" means that assailants acquire a public label which casts them in a negative light.

It's hoped that this terminology will make would-be attackers have second thoughts before committing this terrible act, which can lead to serious injury and even death.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from