Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MAY 2016

Getting your termination notices right – When near enough is not good enough

If the termination notice is defective in any material way then the WA State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) has no power.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Two cases heard in the SAT in 2015 highlighted the need for any notice issued under the Residential Parks (Long Stay Tenants) Act 2006 (the Act) to be drafted in accordance with the Act and to contain accurate information.

The first case Broadview Nominees Pty Ltd and Whalley [2015] WASAT 75 considered an application for termination of a long stay agreement for breach of the agreement. There was no detailed written agreement in place and the tenant was only deemed a long stay tenant as he had resided for greater than ninety days in the Park.

Two problems arose for the Operator. The first was the lack of a written agreement which meant it was difficult to identify what the tenant was in breach of (a provision which was in the Park's standard agreement for relocation within the Park was relied on for the default).  The second was the lapse in time between issuing a notice to remedy the breach and the issue of the termination notice was only twelve days.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from