Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2008

Court Of Appeal Procedure

A practitioner has a positive statutory duty to assist the Court of Appeal in providing adequate written submissions prior to the hearing of the matter.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Kendirjian v Ayoub [2008] NSWCA 194

Beazley and McColl JA

In Brief

  • A practitioner has a positive statutory duty to assist the Court of Appeal in providing adequate written submissions prior to the hearing of the matter;
  • In the event a practitioner is inadequately prepared, the Court may exercise its discretion to order that the practitioner(s), personally bear the wasted costs, pursuant to s 99 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, and
  • It is not material whether surveillance relied upon in proceedings is infrequent or of short duration. The significance of surveillance is whether it depicts a conflict between what is observed during surveillance and the evidence given by the Appellant. In circumstances where such conflict arises, there must be significant doubt as to the Appellant's credit.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from