Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2010

Bellgrove v Eldridge Revisited - Wheeler v Ecroplot Pty Limited [2010] NSWCA 61

In this case, the NSW Court of Appeal confirmed that the prima facie measure of damages where there are defects caused by a breach of a contractual obligation is the cost of rectification, provided the works to be carried out are both necessary under the contract and reasonable, affirming the principle espoused in Bellgrove v Eldridge.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

In this case, the NSW Court of Appeal confirmed that the prima facie measure of damages where there are defects caused by a breach of a contractual obligation is the cost of rectification, provided the works to be carried out are both necessary under the contract and reasonable, affirming the principle espoused in Bellgrove v Eldridge.

The court also confirmed that only exceptional circumstances will mean that rectification is unreasonable, as observed in Tabcorp Holdings Pty Limited v Bowen Investments Pty Limited.

Facts & background

The owners contracted with the respondent builder to build a dwelling on a sloping block. The rear two-thirds of the dwelling was to be constructed over land fill using a cut and fill method.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from