Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2008

Lost In Translation – Issues In US/Australian Contracts

Considering the US is a common law jurisdiction, and English is the native language, it is interesting to note how different US law and practice, including contracts law, can be from ours. The languages of these two jurisdictions, are still very different, and likely to remain so.

AustraliaInternational Law

Introduction – aren't we the same?

Until a fairly recent backlash against it, the theory of "strong convergence" in contracts law internationally has been a popular theme amongst legal academics. There are certainly many codes, international treaties, and glossaries like the International Chamber of Commerce's Incoterms in existence that attempt to bring harmony by globalising contractual terms and contract law fundamentals, at least with respect to shipping trade terms and sale of goods.

However, at the coal face of US/Australia commercial contract negotiations, from intellectual property licencing to service agreements and everything in between, misunderstandings and different priorities are still faced every day in drafting and negotiating contract terms with parties in these jurisdictions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from