Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JUNE 2007

Unjustified Threat Of Infringement

A recent decision by the Federal Court has served as a timely reminder to stakeholders to be wary when making any threat of infringement, awarding the respondent in World of Technologies Pty Ltd v Tempo damages to the value $213,059.96 for lost profits due to an unjustified threat of design infringement.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

World of Technologies (Aust) Pty Ltd v Temp (Aust) [2007] FCA 114 (14 February 2007)

A recent decision by the Federal Court has served as a timely reminder to stakeholders to be wary when making any threat of infringement, awarding the respondent in World of Technologies Pty Ltd v Tempo damages to the value $213,059.96 for lost profits due to an unjustified threat of design infringement.

The Case included a rather involved supply contract review and ultimately revoked World of Technologies’ Australian Design Registration No. 304082

(see Figure 1) for a new bagless vacuum cleaner (later sold under the "Genius" brand – see Figure 2). But perhaps most significant was Jessup J’s finding that a solicitor’s letter to Tempo was an unjustified threat because the design was registered but not certified at the time the letter was sent.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from