Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2021

The Nexus Between IP And Clinical Trials: An Australian Perspective

An inherent tension exists at the nexus between IP and clinical trials arising from the requirements for obtaining patent protection and the disclosure requirements for registration of a clinical trial.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

An inherent tension exists at the nexus between IP and clinical trials arising from the requirements for obtaining patent protection and the disclosure requirements for registration of a clinical trial. This tension has escalated in Australia due to a recent court decision in which it was found that disclosure of untested clinical trial hypotheses can invalidate a patent. As such, patent applicants may wish to think twice before awaiting the outcome of a planned clinical trial before seeking patent protection.

Australia adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki, which provides that information relating to clinical trial protocols must be registered in a publicly accessible database before the first participant is recruited.1 Typically, key details about the design, conduct and administration of planned clinical trials in Australia are registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR). In addition, companies may issue announcements and press

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from