Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 SEPTEMBER 2016

Revisiting exclusivity: Is your patent licence up to scratch?

The Full Court has now given further guidance as to what will constitute an effective exclusive licence of a patent.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

On 9 September 2016 the Full Federal Court of Australia delivered judgment in Actavis Pty Ltd v Orion Corporation [2016] FCAFC 121. The Full Court has now given further guidance as to what will constitute an effective exclusive licence of a patent. The Court also confirmed that where a feature of an invention is identified as preferable, it should not be construed as an essential integer of the invention.

The proceedings related to infringement/revocation of a patent for a 3-in-1 Parkinson's disease drug, Stalevo.

The Full Court, comprising the bench of Chief Justice Allsop, Justice Nicholas and Justice Yates, unanimously upheld the primary judge's findings that:

  1. the licence granted by Orion Corporation (First Respondent) to Novartis Pharma AG (Second Respondent) was an exclusive licence and Novartis Pharma AG therefore had standing to sue Actavis Pty Ltd and Medis Pharma Pty Ltd (Actavis Parties) for patent infringement;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from