Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 AUGUST 2019

Repaired or remade? Refurbished printer cartridges were found to infringe patent

Patentees should consider if refurbished goods were remanufactured (potentially infringing) or repaired (non-infringing).

AustraliaIntellectual Property

In the appeal decision of Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2019] FCAFC 115 the Full Federal Court of Australia found that refurbished printer cartridges infringed an Australian patent. The decision involved consideration of whether modifications made in refurbishing the printer cartridges fell within the scope of an implied license, and whether the modifications related to repair or making a new product.

This decision should be considered both by patentees whose products can be refurbished and sellers or importers of refurbished patented products.

Background

Seiko Epson Corporation ("Seiko") is the owner of Australian Patent No. 2009233643 ("the Patent") directed to printer cartridges. Seiko sold printer cartridges designed only for use with Epson printers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from