Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JANUARY 2020

Preliminary Discovery Granted: Patent For Mining Equipment

MMD supplied a number of its mineral breakers to mine sites in Western Australia.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

The Federal Court in MMD Design and Consultancy Limited v Camco Engineering Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1803 recently granted preliminary discovery to a patentee, giving the patentee information about repair works carried out on rock-breaking equipment used at mine sites.

In granting preliminary discovery, O'Bryan J followed the principles set out by the Full Federal Court in Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals v Samsung Bioepis AU Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 193 (Pfizer v Samsung): an application for preliminary discovery (under Rule 7.23 of the Federal Court Rules) will be granted where a prospective applicant subjectively believes it may have a right to obtain relief, and that belief is, based upon the evidence, reasonably open, even if it is contested. The prospective applicant is not required to reasonably believe he or she actually has the right to obtain relief. We comment further on Pfizer v Samsung here.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from