Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2013

Patentability of genetic material - where does it stand today?

The US Supreme Court and the Federal Court of Australia disagree as to whether an isolated human gene is patentable.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

This article was first published in the Lexis Nexis Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin (newsletter) Volume 26 no 3 September 2013

Key points

  • The Federal Court of Australia recently held that an isolated human gene is patentable, as it is a "method of manufacture".
  • Contrary to the Australian position, the US Supreme Court held that an isolated human gene is not patentable, as it is a "product of nature", which is excluded from patentability under the US Patent Act.
  • The Australian position is unlikely to be affected by the US decision. The Australian government's stance is shifting away from a blanket exclusion and towards implementing safeguards to prevent unconscionable commercial exploitation, such as through research exemptions, compulsory licensing and Crown use, and a ban where commercial exploitation would be wholly offensive.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from