Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 SEPTEMBER 2017

Patent Term Extensions (PTEs) in Australia: under pressure - but safe for now

The outcome of consultation with the sector will not be known for some time and progress will be monitored with interest.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

Government responds to the Productivity Commission Report and the Courts find "Swiss-style" claims not sufficient for a PTE

The Australian Government, in its highly anticipated response to the Productivity Commission's Report, recommended only a minor change to the legislation relating to patent term extensions (PTEs). Almost simultaneously, in the equally eagerly-awaited decision of the Federal Court in Commissioner of Patents v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd [2017] FCAFC 129, it was found that Swiss-style claims do not confer eligibility for a PTE.

Some context: pressure on the PBS budget

Pharmaceuticals are subsidised in Australia by the taxpayer-funded Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). With a population of about 24 million, the Government is under severe and sustained pressure to reduce PBS expenditure from its current level of $10bn, but it must do so in difficult circumstances: the average life-span of Australians is increasing as is the consumption

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from