Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2020

NABs reputation takes it over the bridge

Reputation may be considered as a Surrounding Circumstance when determining whether marks are Deceptively Similar.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

In the Registrar's decision of National Australia Bank Limited [2020] ATMO 41 (19 March 2020), National Australia Bank ("NAB") has successfully relied upon the their significant reputation in Australia to overcome citations of prior rights and secure acceptance of the composite logo mark ("NAB Logo mark") shown below. The Registrar followed the previous decision of the Full Federal Court in Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths [1999] FCA 1020, which held that in certain circumstances, an applicant's reputation may be considered as a "surrounding circumstance" when determining whether two marks should be regarded as "deceptively similar".

nab thebridge

NAB applied to register the NAB Logo mark for a wide range of goods and services. The Examiner raised an objection against this mark under Section 44, on the basis that it was too similar to four earlier registrations and covered the same or similar goods and services. Each of the earlier cited registrations were comprised

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Shelston IP ranked one of Australia's leading Intellectual Property firms in 2015.

See more popular content from