Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2011

Enabling Disclosure No Longer Required To Anticipate A Patent Claim

A recent decision of the Australian Federal Court has cast doubt on the widely-accepted notion that a "paper anticipation" is insufficient to invalidate a patent claim.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

A recent decision of the Australian Federal Court has cast doubt on the widely-accepted notion that a "paper anticipation" is insufficient to invalidate a patent claim.

In Albany Molecular Research Inc v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 120, Albany sued Alphapharm (amongst other generics manufacturers) for infringement of Australian Patent No. 699799. This patent claimed fexofenadine hydrochloride in substantially pure form – and also pharmaceutical compositions and methods of treating allergic conditions using such compounds. Alphapharm was allegedly selling antihistamine products comprising the claimed compounds. In response, Alphapharm counter-claimed for revocation of AU 699799, on grounds including novelty and obviousness.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from