Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JULY 2016

Design registration blows away infringing fan

It is welcome to see a finding for design infringement under the 2003 Act, especially for designs that are not identical.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

In a recent Federal Court decision, Hunter Pacific International v Martec Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 796, the Hon. Nicholas J found that importation and sale of Martec's Razor ceiling fan (Razor) infringed Australian Registered design No. 340171 (AU 340171).

For comparison, corresponding images of AU 340171 and the Razor are shown below.

Given that the two designs were not identical, the question of infringement fell on whether the two designs were substantially similar in overall impression. Consequently, the considerations outlined in Section 19 of the Designs Act 2003 are to be applied. These considerations include: giving more weight to similarities than to differences, having regard of the state of development of the prior art, having regard to any features identified in the statement of the newness and distinctiveness, having regard to the importance of the features that are substantially similar, and having consideration for the freedom for the creator to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from