Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2019

Computer implemented inventions – Australian Full Court Encompass decision

Summary of decision on the issue of manufacture & discussion on how this contrasts with overcoming an innovative step challenge.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

Overview

The patentability of computer implemented inventions (CII) has long been a contentious topic in Australian patent law.

A few months ago, we wrote about Justice Robertson's decision in Rokt Pte Ltd v Commissioner of Patents, which overturned the Australian Patent Office's rejection of a patent application for a CII relating to a digital advertising system and method.

In the latest decision on CII, Encompass Corporation Pty Ltd v Infotrack Pty Ltd, the Full Federal Court unanimously upheld the trial judge's finding that the invention claimed in two innovation patents was not patentable in that it was not a manner of manufacture. The Full Court's decision in the Encompass case continues the increasing line of cases in which CIIs have been found not to be a manner of manufacture.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from