Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JUNE 2019

Australia Update: Swole OClock wins its trade mark battle against time

As demonstrated, any party that relies on the court's discretion for an extension of time should exercise caution.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

In the case of Swole Gym Wear Group Pty Ltd v Swole O'Clock Ltd [2019] FCA 685, the Federal Court dismissed an application for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal against the decision of the Registrar of Trade Marks.

Background

An application was filed by Swole O'Clock Ltd (Swole O'Clock) for the removal of Trade Mark No. 1702160 for SWOLE (the Trade Mark) under s 92(4)(a) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (the Act) on the basis that at the time the application was filed, its owner, Swole Gym Wear Group Pty Ltd (Swole Gym), had no intention in good faith to use the Trade Mark. The removal application was subsequently opposed by Swole Gym.

Swole Gym claimed that the Trade Mark first appeared on its wristband products and adduced evidence of email correspondence and social media posts, from one year prior to the registering of the Trade Mark, to demonstrate that the Trade Mark was registered in good faith. Swole O'Clock highlighted that silicon

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from