Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 OCTOBER 2017

Which principles should be applied when interpreting insurance policies?

The case confirmed that in the end, the natural and ordinary meaning of a word is still the key to policy interpretation.

AustraliaInsurance

A recent Victorian Supreme Court decision has confirmed that a court, when interpreting a policy of insurance, will assess the matters by reference to the 'natural and ordinary meaning' of the word/clause. Simple, right? But determining the 'natural' or 'ordinary' meaning of words is not always straightforward and rarely receives universal acceptance.

Guastalegname v Australian Associated Motor Insurers Ltd [2017] VSC 420 provides a succinct summary of the principles to be applied when interpreting a policy of insurance.

The case concerned the interpretation of the soil movement exclusion in a Home Building Insurance policy. Under the policy, the insurer agreed to indemnify the policyholder in respect of loss, damage or destruction to the building caused by a number of insured events, including storm.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from