Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2009

One Insured + One Loss + Two Insurers = Section 45 Insurance Contracts Act

A party in a contract might be required to indemnify the other party. While this seems straightforward, it can lead to double insurance and some complex problems.

AustraliaInsurance

A party in a contract might be required to indemnify the other party. While this seems straightforward, it can lead to double insurance and some complex problems. The WA Court of Appeal's decision in Speno Rail Maintenance Australia Pty Ltd v Metals & Minerals Insurance Pte Ltd [2009] WASCA 31 (6 February 2009) gives some guidance about how these complex arrangements work, and the operation of section 45 of the Insurance Contracts Act.

Speno entered into a contract with Hamersley, under which it was obliged to indemnify Hamersley for any common-law claims for personal injury to Speno's employees engaged in contract works, and any liability arising from the performance of the works. Speno was also required to arrange liability insurance to cover Hamersley's interest as a principal, which it did. Hamersley however also had its own insurance. A worker was injured due to Hamersley's negligence and sued, triggering the policy - and an avalanche of litigation between the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from