Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 SEPTEMBER 2009

At The Courthouse

This case attracted national media coverage and was declared by some as the end of the childhood ‘sleepover’.

AustraliaInsurance
James Bruun
James Bruun

THOMAS (BY HIS TUTOR, THOMAS) V SHAW [2009] NSWSC 510

This case attracted national media coverage and was declared by some as the end of the childhood 'sleepover'. Thomas, the plaintiff, successfully sued Mr and Mrs Shaw for damages for a serious head injury sustained when he fell from a bunk bed while visiting their home in April 2004.

Key Points:

  • Parents and carers must take reasonable precautions to avoid foreseeable risk of injury to children in their care.
  • The defence of contributory negligence will often not succeed in cases involving children.

The claimant was 10 years old at the time. The bunk bed from which he fell did not have a guard rail or ladder. The Shaws gave evidence that the bunk bed did have a guard rail and ladder when first purchased. However, the guard rail broke within the first year of use and the design of the ladder was apparently poor and kept slipping off and so the Shaws decided to remove it.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from