Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JUNE 2020

There Is No Voidance In Delay: Liquidator Request For Extension Of Time To Bring Voidable Transaction Proceedings Refused

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Liquidators must act promptly when applying for an extension of time to commence proceedings for voidable transactions.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This week's TGIF considers the decision of In the matter of Cohalan & Mitchell Roofing (in liquidation) [2020] VSC 222, where the Supreme Court of Victoria refused to grant an extension of time for filing voidable transaction proceedings.

Background

Cohalan & Mitchell Roofing Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (the Company) conducted a residential roofing business from February 1998 to January 2015. On 20 November 2015, the members of the Company resolved to wind up the Company and David Iannuzzi and Steven Naidenov were appointed as joint and several liquidators (Former Liquidators). The Former Liquidators resigned on 19 April 2017 and the creditors of the Company resolved to appoint Stephen John Michell was appointed as a replacement liquidator (Liquidator).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from