Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2022

TGIF - Eels to play defence, but without winning security for costs

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

When liquidators bring proceedings without a funder, courts may order security for costs, but have discretion not to so.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This week's TGIF considers Campbell J's recent decision in Blackcitrus Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Parramatta Rugby Club Limited [2022] NSWSC 1329, refusing to order security for costs and determining whether to strike out defences based on alleged past breaches of NRL salary cap rules.

Key takeaways

  • When liquidators bring proceedings without a funder or means to meet an adverse costs order, courts may order security for costs but have discretion not to so as to avoid stultifying the proceedings.

  • The content of the liquidators' reports and disclosures can become relevant for liquidators in proving that a defendant has materially contributed to the plaintiff company's insolvency.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from