Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MAY 2020

Leave Refused – Court-appointed Liquidators Protected From Action By Third Parties

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

This decision confirms a protective attitude towards court-appointed liquidators, acting as a "delegate" of the court.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This week's TGIF considers the decision in Aardwolf Industries LLC v Riad Tayeh [2020] NSWSC 299, in which the Supreme Court of New South Wales refused an application for leave to sue court-appointed liquidators for damages for negligence and misleading and deceptive conduct.

Background

On 8 August 2011, liquidators were appointed to Herdgraph Pty Ltd and Aardwolf Pty Ltd (Companies), pursuant to a court order. As part of the winding-up process, the liquidators sold the Companies' trademarks to Mr Nguyen, a competitor of the two companies.

The plaintiffs were entities related to the Companies, with all four companies sharing directors. The plaintiffs sought to bring actions in negligence and misleading and deceptive conduct against the liquidators, on the basis that the Companies had abandoned the trademarks and ownership over them had passed to the plaintiffs. Thus, the Companies had no right to sell those trademarks. This proceeding involved the application

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from