Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MARCH 2018

Is a non-circulating security interest really non-circulating? Lessons from Re Amerind

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

The case has useful implications for secured creditors and insolvency practitioners called upon to adjudicate on claims.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

In Australia, secured creditors only enjoy absolute statutory priority over employee and administrator costs over non-circulating secured property.

The introduction of the Personal Properties Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (PPSA) brought significant changes to the regime for the classification of circulating and non-circulating assets, including the creation of a new set of rules in relation to the creation of non-circulating security interests over debtors and inventory.

Various attempts have been made to draft provisions which create non-circulating security interests over inventory and debtors relying on the provisions contained in the PPSA. If a non-circulating security interest is successfully created, then this has the potential to meaningfully change the outcome of an insolvency scenario for secured creditors.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from