Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MAY 2022

Court rejects bid to appoint special purpose liquidator

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

In recent case the court declined to appoint a special purpose liquidator to pursue claims available to the company.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This week's TGIF considers In the matter of Jabiru Satellite Limited (in liq) and NewSat Limited (in liq)  [2022] NSWSC 459 where the Court declined to appoint a special purpose liquidator to pursue claims available to the company.

Key Takeaways

  • On any application to appoint a special purpose liquidator, it will be critical to the exercise of the court's discretion to demonstrate that the appointment will be just and beneficial to creditors.

  • If the appointment is to pursue potential recovery actions, the terms of any funding arrangement will be closely analysed, including the proposed fee to any identified funder.

  • If a funding fee exceeds usual market rates, evidence will be required to justify that fee so as to ensure that the appointment and proposed claim can be regarded as beneficial to the winding up.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from