Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2015

The Fertility Control Clinic case: When are decision-makers allowed to make an error?

This Victorian decision was a timely reminder that not every erroneous conclusion will lead a court to issue a remedy.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector
Mathew Bock (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Mathew Bock (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Author LinkedIn connections

Key Points:

Not every erroneous conclusion will lead a court to issue a remedy.

The Supreme Court of Victoria's recent decision in Fertility Control Clinic v Melbourne City Council [2015] VSC 424 is a reminder that Australian courts will continue to tolerate some kinds of errors in decision-making, and that not all errors by decision-makers will necessarily led to a court issuing mandamus to compel the performance of a duty according to law. However, the distinction between the two kinds of errors can be elusive.

Background: a complaint about protesters

The Fertility Control Clinic operates a medical clinic in Melbourne which provides a range of family planning and reproductive services including pregnancy termination. For more than 20 years, the Helpers of God's Precious Infants have gathered near the clinic to protest.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from