Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MAY 2015

Keep the faith! Pitfalls to avoid when negotiating with native title parties

Two recent decisions of the National Native Title Tribunal show how NOT to conduct native title negotiations.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector

Key Points:

Proponents of resources projects should take note: two recent decisions of the National Native Title Tribunal provide graphic illustration of how NOT to conduct native title negotiations.

Two recent decisions (Collins v Nguddaboolgan, decided on 25 March 2015, and Rusa Resources v Wajarri Yamatji, decided on 2 April 2015) contain important pointers for proponents seeking to avoid falling into the trap of having their negotiations found not to have been conducted in good faith.

Negotiation between native title parties in good faith

Where a proposed mineral or petroleum exploration or production permit will cover areas where native title has not been extinguished, the grant of the permit will be invalid for native title purposes unless an appropriate native title procedure has been followed. The procedure most commonly used in these circumstances is known as the "right to negotiate" (RTN).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from